COPY RIGHTS : TO AVOID COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS, ALL POSTS ARE SHOWN ALONG WITH SOURCES FROM WHERE ITS TAKEN. PLEASE CONTACT ME IN MY EMAIL SALEEMASRAF@GMAIL.COM , IF YOU ARE THE AUTHOR AND YOUR NAME IS NOT DISPLAYED IN THE ARTICLE.THE UNINTENTIONAL LAPSE ON MY PART WILL BE IMMEDIATELY CORRECTED.

I HAVE SHARED ALL MY PRACTICAL WATER TREATMENT EXPERIENCES WITH SOLVED EXAMPLE HERE SO THAT ANYBODY CAN USE IT.

SEARCH THIS BLOG BELOW FOR ENVO ,COMPACT STP,ETP,STP,FMR,MBBR,SAFF,IRON,ARSENIC,FLUORIDE,FILTER,RO,UASB,BIO GAS,AERATION TANK,SETTLING TANK,DOSING,AMC.

SEARCH THIS BLOG

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Design of recharge structures and settlement tank water harvesting

The rate of recharge in comparison to runoff is a critical factor. However, since accurate recharge rates are not available without detailed geo-hydrological studies, the rates have to be assumed. The capacity of recharge tank is designed to retain runoff from at least 15 minutes rainfall of peak intensity. (For Delhi, peak hourly rainfall is 90 mm (based on 25 year frequency) and 15 minutes peak rainfall is 22.5 mm/hr, say, 25 mm, according to CGWB norms).
Illustration
For an area of 100 sq. m.,
volume of desilting tank required in Delhi = 100 x 0.025 x 0.85
                                                            = 2.125 cu. m. (2,125 litres)

Design of a recharge trench

The methodology of design of a recharge trench is similar to that for a settlement tank. The difference is that the water-holding capacity of a recharge trench is less than its gross volume because it is filled with porous material. A factor of loose density of the media (void ratio) has to be applied to the equation. The void ratio of the filler material varies with the kind of material used, but for commonly used materials like brickbats, pebbles and gravel, a void ratio of 0.5 may be assumed.
Using the same method as used for designing a settlement tank:
Assuming a void ratio of 0.5, the required capacity of a recharge tank
        = (100 x 0.025 x 0.85)/0.5
        = 4.25 cu. m. (4,250 litres)

In designing a recharge trench, the length of the trench is an important factor. Once the required capacity is calculated, length can be calculated by considering a fixed depth and width.
http://www.rainwaterharvesting.org/Urban/Design_Recharge.htm



manual on rain water harvesting Central ground water board

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

web site for rain water harvesting


Rain water harvesting Design of storage tanks

Design of storage tanks
The volume of the storage tank can be determined by the following factors:
  • Number of persons in the household: The greater the number of persons, the greater the storage capacity required to achieve the same efficiency of fewer people under the same roof area.
  • Per capita water requirement: This varies from household to household based on habits and also from season to season. Consumption rate has an impact on the storage systems design as well as the duration to which stored rainwater can last.
  • Average annual rainfall
  • Period of water scarcity: Apart from the total rainfall, the pattern of rainfall -whether evenly distributed through the year or concentrated in certain periods will determine the storage requirement. The more distributed the pattern, the lesser the size.
  • Type and size of the catchment:Type of roofing material determines the selection of the runoff coefficient for designs. Size could be assessed by measuring the area covered by the catchment i.e., the length and horizontal width. Larger the catchment, larger the size of the required cistern (tank).
Dry season demand versus supply approach
In this approach there are three options for determining the volume of storage:
  1. Matching the capacity of the tank to the area of the roof
  2. Matching the capacity of the tank to the quantity of water required by its users
  3. Choosing a tank size that is appropriate in terms of costs, resources and construction methods.
In practice the costs, resources and the construction methods tend to limit the tanks to smaller capacities than would otherwise be justified by roof areas or likely needs of consumers. For this reason elaborate calculations aimed at matching tank capacity to roof area is usually unnecessary. However a simplified calculation based on the following factors can give a rough idea of the potential for rainwater colection.
IllustrationSuppose the system has to be designed for meeting drinking water requirement of a five-member family living in a building with a rooftop area of 100 sq. m. The average annual rainfall in the region is 600 mm (average annual rainfall in Delhi is 611 mm). Daily drinking water requirement per person (drinking and cooking) is 10 litres.

Design procedure:

Following details are available:
Area of the catchment (A) = 100 sq. m.
Average annual rainfall (R) = 611 mm (0.61 m)
Runoff coefficient (C) = 0.85 1. Calculate the maximum amount of rainfall that can be harvested from the rooftop:
Annual water harvesting potential = 100 x 0.6 x 0.85
                                                 = 51 cu. m. (51,000 litres)
2. Determine the tank capacity: This is based on the dry period, i.e., the period between the two consecutive rainy seasons. For example, with a monsoon extending over four months, the dry season is of 245 days.
3. Calculate drinking water requirement for the family for the dry season
        = 245 x 5 x 10
        = 12,250 litres
As a safety factor, the tank should be built 20 per cent larger than required, i.e., 14,700 litres. This tank can meet the basic drinking water requirement of a 5-member family for the dry period. A typical size of a rectangular tank constructed in the basement will be about 4.0 m x 4.0 m x 1.0 m


Salient features of this approach:

  1. Simplest approach to system design but is relevant only in areas where distinct dry seasons exist
  2. Provides a rough estimate of storage volume requirements
  3. This method does not take into account variations between different years, such as the occurrence of drought years. It also entirely ignores rainfall input and the capacity of the catchment to deliver the runoff necessary to fill the storage tank.
  4. This technique can be used in the absence of any rainfall data and is easily understandable to the layperson.These points are especially relevant when designing systems in the remote areas of developing countries where obtaining reliable rainfall data can be difficult.
http://www.rainwaterharvesting.org/Urban/Design_Storage.htm



manual on rain water harvesting Central ground water board

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

web site for rain water harvesting


cost rain water harvesting 1000 sq mtr

 http://www.cgwb.gov.in/documents/RWH_GUIDE.pdf


manual on rain water harvesting Central ground water board

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

web site for rain water harvesting


PROPOSAL FOR RECHARGE PIT :
Total Area Contributing to Run Off : 10,000 sq feet= 1000 Sq Mtr
For design consideration, rainfall intensity of 25 mm has to be taken into account
Considering four recharge pits,
Recharge Pit Size : 2 x 2 x 2.25 Mtr ; Filter material Depth = 0.9 mtr
Depth to water level in summer (Pre Monsoon)= 25 mtr bgl , Hence bore well depth should be atleast 25 mtr bgl
COST ESTIMATE OF WELL :
PIT SIZE : 2 x 2 x 2.25 mtr, 4 nos , Filter material Depth =0.9 mtr


Sr No


Work


Qty


Unit


Rate


Amount (Rs)


1


Excavation


9


cum


300/=


2700


2


PCC,0.10m thick at footing


0.2


cum


2700/=


540


3


B/W, 0.23 m thick


4.14


cum


2400/=


9936


4


Plaster(Inside)


18


Sq m


85/=


1530


5


Coarse sand ,2 mm size,0.3 mtr depth, as filter material in injection well


1.2


cum


1000/=


1200


6


Gravel, 5 mm size ,0.3 mtr depth, as filter material in injection well


1.2


cum


1000/=


1200


7


Boulder, 5 mm size, 0.3 mtr depth, as filter material in injection well


1.2


cum


1000/=


1200


8


Pea Gravel ,5 mm size ,between inwell bore and casing , volume=0.03 sq mtr x depth in mtr


0.75


cum


1200/=


900


9


RCC Cover over injection well pit,0.10 m thick


0.4


cum


4000/=


1600


10


Removal of debris


9


cum


200/=


1800


11


Inwell bore, 10 inch dia


25


mtr


800/=


20,000


12


Casing, 6 Inches, MS, Blind


15


mtr


650/=


9750


13


Casing, 6 Inches, MS, Slots


10


mtr


750/=


7500


14


MS pipe interconnecting to injection well pit, 4 inch dia


mtr


400/=


NA


15


MS pipe laying and fittings


mtr


300/=


NA


16


Development charges


LS


7,500/=


17


Pipe Lowering


LS


5000/=


18


Demolision by jack hammering for breaking the RCC floor for laying MS interconnecting pipes


Hourly


400/=


NA


19


Dwarf Wall, B/W, 0.23 mtr thick,0.5 mtr depth


cum


1550/=


NA


20


TOTAL


72356


21


PROFIT


%


20


14471


22


Overhead


%


10


7235


23


TOTAL


94062


24


ROUND OFF


95,000/=


25


NUMBERS


4


26


QUOTATION


3,80,000/=